In Financial Capitalism most of the innovative ventures are done for robbing money. In Socialist China, DeepSeek R1 took investment of US $ 0.5 per mn tokens. For producing same Financial Capitalist society's USA's OpenAI O1 took US $ 15.00 per mn tokens. Financial Capitalist USA innovates same thing as Socialist China with 30 times more investment cost. This huge difference shows Financial Capitalist New Industrial Ventures are mostly money laundering through share market by raising share prices. Most of the investment taken through share market are used for fat salaries to CEOs, CFOs, etc. and very meagre amount goes to create the actual product.

This is The Greatest Victory of Socialism over Capitalism. For the 1st time in history, Socialism is proving to finance New Industrial Ventures more efficiently than Financial Capitalism. USSR already proved Socialism's superiority in Socialization of Production in Workplace and China since 1980s have been proving superiority of Socialization of Production in Market as well. Now Socialist superiority in financing New Industrial Ventures is proved as well.

Moreover, even under severe restrictions on AI chip import from USA, DeepSeek R1 beat US companies like OpenAI, Google, MicroSoft, Meta through algorythm optimization. DeepSeek is not only easy to use but also made Open Source which has hollowed out billlions of US Dollar investments by US AI companies. 

In the article "Plunder Capital, Merchant Capital, Productive Capital and Speculative Capital" ( https://www.eastisrising.in/view-news/306 ) I wrote: However, when there is free flow of speculative capital, innovative ventures benefit partly because the innovative ventures receive a part of speculative capital investment. However, very little of the loans go to innovative enterprises, and most of them go to shares or stocks of established enterprises or to land, metal, etc.
Now the only positive part of Financial Capital is eclipsed by Socialism. 

Oguji John writes:

You will notice that when you are dating a girl you have never pierced, you will notice her character is different from the women you have peirced, you feel it that you have not dominated her, she misbehaves at will, gives you some kind of troubles, this is because she knows that if you are to break up with her, she hasn't lost anything, its your lost and its her win.
No woman has more pride and ego than a woman you have not yet slept with, to women sex means more than just a cum and go event, its means more to them than what It means to man.
This is why it's difficult for an average man to get sex cheaply from even below average women and very much easier for a below average woman to get sex cheaply from even a high value man.
Women value sex, they just don't open their legs free of charge to any man, they control that aspect of life and this is why before they spread their legs for any man that man must have value that they has or can benefit from.
A less valuable man will get little or no sex from women but a high value man will get enough sex from women.
Its what it is.
Now the point of this post is this.
As a man as long as you have not yet slept with a woman, she still sees herself as someone who is more valuable or equal to you to you.
The only way you can exact your full dominance is to fvck her, the moment you do that, she automatically know that you have conquered her territory and it stays that way.
This is one major way you can have more dominance over female gender.
 

Between 1325 and 1353, Moroccan scholar Ibn Battuta traveled over 75,000 miles, exploring Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. His journeys included:

1325-1327: Pilgrimages to Mecca and travels through the Middle East
1330-1332: Serving as a judge in India’s Delhi Sultanate
1332-1346: Crossing Asia, reaching China, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives
1349-1353: Returning through North Africa, sharing his vast knowledge
Ibn Battuta’s Rihla still inspires global explorers today.