Whenever the word ‘choice’ comes into existence regarding gender relations, it automatically refers to female choice while completely shunning male choice. Feminism states that a woman can live voluntary life but a man must be stuck in the involuntary patriarchal role. An emancipated man threatens the decadent patriarchy to the core.The sex revolution never meant change in gender relations but making patriarchy gynocentric. And the very core concept of the sex revolution was women must be liberated from their patriarchal duties while retaining all the rights while men must be involuntarily forced into patriarchal duties without any rights, benefits in return. Plus state policies always favored women and disfavored men making the gender equation tilted towards women favor. Gendered crimes on men (ex- female on male domestic violence, female on male rape etc) were completely unrecognized and suppressed via overamplyifying golden uterus syndrome, Electra complex, helpless damsel syndrome etc. Whenever the issue of individual liberty of men comes up, the stereotypical response is ‘Women are oppressed’. Just for arguments sake let’s assume the story of female oppression is true. But that dosen’t nullify any of the male gender based issues and male oppression. Now the truth is historically human society has always pedestalized women and put men down via different means. So suppressing male issues is a grave social and historicalinjustice by itself. Historically, individual liberties were limited for both genders. What feminism did was to give women complete freedom without accountability and enforced upon men all the responsibilities without any semblance of individualfreedom. Men are required to fulfillinvoluntary duties towards family, society and nation without any compensation while for women that is the opposite, the same obligations are not applicable for women while getting all the privilages of the old patriarchy. Despite we are living in a low-birth society, the Golden Uterus myth is invoked to justify the status-quo. In terms of things that absolutely personal, male choices are villified by the establishment. A man cannot have his mating preference, cannot live his life independently and has to accept the forced servitude without any question. Similarly, male consent regarding sexual relation is completely vilified by the establishment and sexual crimes against men are justified via different means. We have a selective welfare state where all the social securities for men are being liquidated so men can be forced into modern slavery via bread. Young men are asked to toil like CEO for living in subsistence. Overall, the male choice regarding profession and lifestyle is also vanquished. Involuntary forced labor is exploitation so it can be easily said that today’s gynocratic system thrives on male exploitation. Ruling classes and their lackeys who want to maintain status quo support this arrangement.
This is completely unacceptable. Firstly it’s morally and ethically wrong and obliterates the concept of justice, fairness and equality. Secondly, it violates the principle of payment according to ability and exchange value. So it’s anti-modern and reactionary too. Lastly, it is unfit for the world which seeks to enter in the 4th industrial revolution. Modernization means increasing productive forces and this nefarious system is a stumbling bloc for further progress of humanity. For further modernization, all physical and manual labor must be automated so that vast majority of men can be emanicipated. Also male choice must be established so that men can be motivated to pursue the professions which they like which in turn will increase productivity. Cutting of unjustified freebies will also increase productivity. So we can easily see that the current system is unfit for 21st Century.
So, all the Emanicipated men, proudly proclaim ‘My life, My body, My choice’.
Author: Purandhar Khilji
